EPA's Naming of Formaldehyde as a Candidate for High Priority Under TSCA Raises Serious Concerns
Statement of Dr. Richard Denison, Lead Senior Scientist at Environmental Defense Fund
“EPA’s statement today regarding its inclusion of formaldehyde on the list of chemicals under consideration for prioritization for risk evaluation under TSCA leaves many questions unanswered.
EPA states that ‘the work done for IRIS will inform the TSCA process.’ Such consideration is already required by law.
What is absolutely essential is that the IRIS program be able to complete its assessment of formaldehyde, which has been suppressed for the last year and a half by conflicted EPA political appointees. Then EPA’s TSCA office, just like every other EPA office, can and should rely on it to make regulatory decisions.It’s time that political interference in the agency’s science stop.”
- Dr. Richard Denison, Lead Senior Scientist at Environmental Defense Fund
For more information see the following EDF blog post: The Trump EPA’s actions on formaldehyde can be summed up in one word: Corrupt
With more than 3 million members, Environmental Defense Fund creates transformational solutions to the most serious environmental problems. To do so, EDF links science, economics, law, and innovative private-sector partnerships to turn solutions into action. edf.org
Media Contact
Latest press releases
-
Supreme Court Hears Arguments Related to California’s Clean Air Protections
April 23, 2025 -
New Seafood Executive Order Puts American Seafood Competitiveness At Risk
April 18, 2025 -
California Must Lead on Climate Action through Cap-and-Trade Extension this Year
April 15, 2025 -
Reports: Trump Administration Plans Detrimental Cuts to NOAA Climate Research
April 11, 2025 -
Senate Bill Would Reduce Risk of Catastrophic Wildfires
April 11, 2025 -
EPA Reportedly Plans to Stop Collecting Data about Climate Pollution
April 11, 2025