COURT AFFIRMS HISTORIC CLEAN AIR STANDARDS
(March 26, 2002 — Washington, DC) Today a three-judge panel of the United States Federal Court of Appeals ruled for the second time on critical new health-based clean air standards, firmly rejecting industry’s renewed challenges to overturn the standards. On May 14, 1999, the same panel of judges ruled 2-1 that the standards were unconstitutional, only to be reversed in a unanimous decision by the United States Supreme Court on February 27, 2001. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) established the clean air standards at issue in 1997 to protect public health by limiting nationwide pollution levels of smog (ground-level ozone) and fine, sooty particles.
“It is a public health imperative that the Bush administration, our nation’s governors and mayors across the country take immediate action to begin making these clean air standards a reality,” said Environmental Defense senior attorney Vickie Patton. “For nearly five years, the legal wrangling by industry lawyers has delayed critical progress in delivering cleaner, healthier air to the millions of Americans that will be protected by these standards.”
When EPA issued the standards in 1997, it estimated that when implemented the standards would protect 125 million Americans from adverse health effects of air pollution and each year would prevent
15,000 premature deaths,
350,000 cases of aggravated asthma, and
1 million cases of significantly decreased lung function in children.
Since then, a body of scientific research has only strengthened the medical basis for the standards. On March 6, 2002, the Journal of the American Medical Association published a study of 500,000 people across the country finding that prolonged exposure to air contaminated with fine particles significantly raises the risk of dying of lung cancer or other heart and lung diseases. Other recent studies have linked the pollutants at issue with increased risk of asthma in children (The Lancet, 2002; JAMA, 2001) (ozone); acute stroke mortality (Environmental Health Perspectives, 2002) (particulates and ozone); and birth defects (American Journal of Epidemiology, 2002) (ozone). A study of the 90 largest U.S. cities found strong evidence linking daily increases in particulate pollution at contemporary levels to increases in daily death rates, and in hospital admissions of the elderly (Health Effects Institute, 2000). Another study has indicated that chronic exposure to particulate pollution may shorten lives by one to three years (Environmental Health Perspectives, 2000).
Environmental Defense led a coalition of environmental organizations in helping to successfully defend the clean air standards in two related cases before the United States Supreme Court.
With more than 3 million members, Environmental Defense Fund creates transformational solutions to the most serious environmental problems. To do so, EDF links science, economics, law, and innovative private-sector partnerships to turn solutions into action. edf.org
Latest press releases
-
New Seafood Executive Order Puts American Seafood Competitiveness At Risk
April 18, 2025 -
California Must Lead on Climate Action through Cap-and-Trade Extension this Year
April 15, 2025 -
Reports: Trump Administration Plans Detrimental Cuts to NOAA Climate Research
April 11, 2025 -
Senate Bill Would Reduce Risk of Catastrophic Wildfires
April 11, 2025 -
EPA Reportedly Plans to Stop Collecting Data about Climate Pollution
April 11, 2025 -
IMO's Climate Diplomacy Sets the Course for the Shipping Sector’s Energy Transition
April 11, 2025